Gender Across Borders

The articles that you sent us from Gender Across Borders were very relevant to today’s class particularly the one America, Hijab, and the Muslim Female Experience.  It’s terrible that we associate a head covering with terrorism.  I just don’t understand why these women had to take their hijabs off.  Wearing them was by no means interfering with their performance at work.  Our society has come to associate Muslim with terrorism.  That shouldn’t be the case though.  Yes, a few people of the Muslim religion committed acts of terrorism, but Muslims, as a whole should not be penalized.   If a white Christian male goes into a school and kills students, we do not ostracize the whites, Christian, or males.  We are supposed to be the “land of the free” but yet we will not allow women to wear a scarf on their heads.  It drives me insane that we have allowed the “war on terrorism’ to turn into a “war on gender and Muslims.” 

In Our Bodies are not a Battlefield:  The Invisible Impacts of Armed Violence in Colombia, I was shocked to learn that 60 to 70 percent of Colombian women have been abused.  I understand that in a machista culture that having guns is seen as protection, but I am disgruntled to learn that the guns are not used for protection but as an aid in the violence of women.  The more I learn about other cultures, the more I realize I didn’t know.  I realize that there are many issues in the world, but I had no idea how many.  I was unaware of all of the sexual violence in Columbia.  I grew up thinking that women were equal to men, and this class has taught me to be thankful for the rights that I have and be aware of the gendered conflicts in the United States as well as across the world.  I cannot imagine the psychological effects that these women who have been raped or sexual slaves have experienced.    

The interview with the male teenagers from the district of Aguablanca got to the heart of what peace is.  They said that peace begins in the home and that if you grow up seeing violence you think that violence is the only way to solve problems.  These boys seemed to understand the direction that we need to go.  We need to teach peace in the home at a young age because if children see that problems can be solved in a peaceful way they will be more inclined to solve their problems in a peaceful way and be less likely to join armed groups.  

Religion

When reading Honour killings:  Saved from India’s caste system by the Love Commandos, I felt very conflicted.  I am a very religious person, growing up in a Catholic home and attending Catholic school.  When I was younger, I felt a strong adherence to the rules of the church; however, now that I am learning more, I have come to question certain aspects of religion.  I use to think that Catholicism was perfect, but now I’ve come to learn that no religion is perfect.  I believe that it is more important now just to have faith no matter what it is and remember those simple rules about loving one another, being thankful for the things that we are blessed with, and asking for forgiveness.  Just as I have questioned or challenged certain aspects of my religion, this article demonstrates how this couple is subjected to difficulties based on their caste.  At first, I was appalled that arranged marriages still happen and that marrying outside of your caste is forbidden, but then I thought about the fact that this is their culture.  This is what they are accustomed to and who are we to judge them for living like this?  I do find the killing of these couples outrageous, but at the same time I can understand why they continue the arranged marriages and the practices that they have. 

It’s a tough situation.  Where does the line of adherence to religion end?  How literal are we suppose to interpret the religious materials? Religion is just one of those touchy subjects.  There’s certainly no right answer.  Everyone interprets it differently and responds differently.  Religion is one of those things that I think we need to keep out of.  As Americans we love to get involved in the rest of the world’s business, but religion is one thing that we should just let be.

Poems from Class

The poems we did in class were very fitting.   And When You Leave, Take Your Pictures With You sadly seems very accurate.  Too many people are inclined to do things because what they are doing will be a resume builder or make them feel better for the all of the times that they neglected to do the right thing.  Not only do people do things for the wrong reasons, but they also take pictures so that they have proof of their good work.  They are exploiting other people’s misfortune to then better themselves.  The focus when going to a place that needs help is to help them, not yourself.  It’s about being selfless, not selfish.  We should be trying to get these people in a situation where they can provide for themselves and increase the quality of their lives. 

The Bridge Poem discusses what it feels like to be the mediator in a situation.  The speaker is the mediator between members of her family and several different cultural and religious groups.  The speaker feels as though she spends more time being this bridge between different groups than being the bridge to the speaker’s future.  It is certainly easy to get lost spending time as the bridge between people, but it is important to remember to stay focused on your future.  If you are true to yourself and do what you should be doing, you will make more of an impact than if you get lost in everyone else’s business.  If you spend all of your time being everyone else’s bridge you will lose sight of your own bridge.

In When I Was Growing Up, the speaker in this poem describes several ways in which she wishes that she were white.  When I first started reading this poem, I assumed that the girl was black.  I did not expect her to be Asian.  This poem reminds me of the article that we had everyone read for our presentation because the speaker talks about being forced to fit the stereotypical role of an exotic gardenia or an oriental chick.  I hate that she feels that she needs to fit some sort of stereotype in order to be liked.  The pressure of society can easily make you feel insecure about yourself and your culture.  We analyze every aspect of ourselves looking at our imperfections instead of being proud of the gifts that we have. 

Roles in Relationships

This presentation really got everyone talking.  The survey spurred some thoughts about traditional roles in relationships versus a more egalitarian relationship.  I think that the survey probably needed to be a little more specific in the way the questions were asked because there are so many different types of family structures.  We have a lot of overlap in the chores that my family does.  My mom works longer hours than my dad does so despite my dad’s subpar cooking skills, he had to step up to the plate and handle some of the cooking in the house.  My brother and I grew up doing the exact same chores.  We both did the weeding and the dish washing.  No work should be considered “woman’s work” or a “man’s job.”  It should be about compromising and doing what’s best for the family in that situation. 

Our class is certainly leaning towards a more egalitarian view of relationship roles.  I thought that it was interesting how the main couple in the video we watched were portrayed.  The man was shown as the nurturer, and the woman was depicted as the provider.  I realize what they were trying to portray to the public, but it’s funny how they had to make them completely opposite of the stereotypical roles.  It’s as if they had to do a complete role reversal in order to prove to society that this could work.  I would have preferred to see something where they were equally helping each other with whatever task they were performing.  That video made it look like it was all for show.

The roles in a relationship are dynamic not static.   They can and will change over the course of the relationship.  Assuming Abe and I stay together, while I am in medical school, he will be the provider, but when I get out it will be more balanced.  Perhaps when we have kids, he will cut back on his hours and be the more of the stay-at-home dad.  Of course this is hard to determine now, but I know that we will compromise.  He loves to cook, and I love to clean.  You have to be willing to compromise in a relationship if you want it to work.  

Contested Spaces

Coming Apart was an interesting excerpt because it dares to talk to about pornography, which is sometimes a difficult topic.  I don’t really know much about pornography, but this passage made a comment that really stuck with me.  They refer to white women as ‘objects’ and black women as ‘animals’.  Neither of these characterizations is acceptable.   Objects and animals? I’m cringing at the thought of these words.  They are so hurtful, and they reinforce the negative way that women are treated.  The husband doesn’t realize the implications of his actions.  He brings home these pornographic magazines that do nothing but make his wife feel like an animal.  He puts more distance between the two of them until they eventually they have to take a break.  I had no idea that the root of pornography was with black women.  I should have inferred this because of slavery and the vicious treatment that they endured. 

The other article that I would like to discuss with this is Cudd’s Oppression by Choice.  In this article, Cudd argues that social structures can lead to oppression and that oppressed people continue their own oppression, reinforcing it.  This seems like an awful cycle where women are coerced to make decisions based on the social institutions that are shaping the way they live.  I particularly enjoyed the hypothetical situation between Larry and Lisa.  It makes perfect sense how together they decided to do something that they thought was for the best interest of the family, but in the end, this decision put Lisa on an unequal playing field with Larry, leaving her susceptible to subjugation.  The worst part about this was that the wage gap was what led them to the decision they made.  It’s ridiculous that men on average make 64% more than women when they’ve had the same amount of education. 

One of the important factors of oppression is that someone must be the oppressor and someone must be the oppressed.  You would think that it would be an easy cycle to end.  Treat everyone with respect and there would no longer be an oppressor or and oppressed.  So why is it so difficult for us to do this?  Unfortunately, people are very power hungry, and this drive for power makes people stop at nothing to get to the top.  Or people use the oppressed to feel better about their lives.  They go do mission trips for the wrong reasons.  The anecdote that Celia mentioned in class about the student who hoped that the oppressed people would still be there so her kids could experience the same thing was very upsetting.  Clearly, the goal of the trip was not to help the oppressed get out of their oppression…

Transgender

I was really glad that we had a transgender presentation because I was completely unknowledgeable in that area.  It is hard to understand how someone feels when you are not in his or her situation.  We are so quick to judge things as being weird or abnormal.  But we who defines what normal is?  I’m happy that Andie came and spoke to our class. I really enjoyed hearing what she had to say and having the opportunity to understand where she is coming from. I wish that people were more open-minded.  Andie is a wonderful girl and should be proud of who she is but instead has to endure difficult situations everywhere she turns. 

We are all humans when it comes down to it.  Who cares whether your sexual preference is male, female, or both?  Who cares what gender you identify with?  You should be accepted for who you are.  I think that the new model that they are forming is a strong starting block for how to describe gender.  It certainly should not be seen in a linear way.  I like that they are taking into considerations attributions, identity, and expression.  I am somewhat surprised that there isn’t already a model similar to this.  The nice thing with this model is that it takes into accounts several factors of gender as opposed to the linear model. 

I had never thought of gender in a fluid way, but it certainly makes sense.  Aspects of my personality are more masculine and some are more feminine.  Certain aspects change from day to day as well.  Before this class, I viewed gender in a very linear way.  I thought it was black and white, but I have come to learn that there is much more to it than that.  The only that I still have a hard time understanding is the assigning of the 0 instead of feminine or masculine.  I cannot grasp how something is completely gender neutral.  I don’t think that they are polar opposites, but I feel like you identify, express, and attribute just a little more towards the masculine or feminine side.  I wish I could get in the head of someone who does view the world in an entirely gender neutral way. 

Putting the shoe on the other foot is a difficult thing to accomplish, so it was nice having Andie there.  I wish that we had more time so we could have learned more.  Andie told me after class that in the United States if you go through a sex change, they make you sterile so you cannot have kids.  In Europe though you are allowed to have kids.  I wanted to share this on my blog because I was unsure of this so I asked, and I imagine that other people may have also been wondering the same thing.

The Media

 We quickly come to stereotype people from other different areas and cultures of the world.  When I think of an Asian woman, I think of a tiny woman with the traditional kimono, her hair in bun with chopsticks, and her feet wrapped.  Stereotype.  When I think of a Latino woman, I think of the spicy woman dressed in provocative clothing speaking very quickly and fiercely.  Where do I get these cultural perceptions when I have never been to Asia or Latin America?  The media.  The media does a great job of lumping people of several different cultures into one identity.  They try to put a face to an entire continent, when in reality there are a million different cultures and types of people on each continent. 

Who makes up the media?  How do they have the power to control cultural perceptions?  They can easily place a positive or negative image on an entire area of the world with one picture.  The fact that I was asked in Armenia if my life was like Sex and the City is a prime example.

When you turn on the news, what do you see?  Awful things.  The majority of what the media portrays are these negative images of people, places, ideas, etc.  I can’t remember the last time that I saw them highlight the positive things that people are doing around the world to improve society.  Unfortunately society doesn’t like to see the positive things.  We like to see that Tyra put on 50lbs or that Angelina lashed out at baby Shiloh.  That’s what we read when we pick up the magazines.  It is an ugly cycle that the media feeds on.  Everyone likes to watch the celebrities and higher officials fail.  Every time I turned on ESPN after the Tiger Woods scandal, they were releasing some new information about this girl or that girl.  This story went on for months upon months.  Why?  Because people were entertained by someone else’s failure. 

It’s crazy to think that the media has as much of an influence as they do.  They have the power to change people’s ideas and impressions.  It would be interesting to see what would happen if they started displaying the positive things.  Showing the positive things that are going on in society might make a happier world.  We would be more globalized if we just accurately understood other cultures.  Thanks to the media for inaccurately portraying cultures and feeding off of other people’s failures.